Legacy Planning and the Future
A few months ago, I received a survey sent to alumni of the University of Georgia Redcoat Band. If you didn’t already know, I’m a rabid Georgia Bulldog alum through and through. My devotion to the Dawgs started at a very young age, and my four years in the Redcoats during my time at Georgia cemented my love for the Red & Black. Once I graduated, I faithfully attended alumni band at Homecoming in the fall for many years until life became too busy with children. I still keep in close contact with my Redcoat friends and participate in the Redcoat community along with other events aside from Homecoming. I consider the Redcoats an extended family that has stuck with me through the decades.
The survey I received had to do with legacy planning and financially supporting the Redcoat Band. For the majority of the band’s 120 years of existence, the athletic department has financed most of the band’s budget. However, the landscape of college football has changed dramatically recently due to the implementation of NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness). In case you’re not aware of the impact of NIL, colleges can now pay their student athletes. It’s a free for all right now, and it’ll take a while to get things under control – if it ever happens. Athletic departments are cutting where they can to subsidize various revenue streams in an attempt to fund NIL. For the past two years, the size of the Redcoat Band has shrunk due to budget cuts, and so the UGA Redcoat Alumni Band, which formed a nonprofit about 20 years ago, has attempted to take up the slack as best as possible. As such, the UGA Foundation partnered with them to support the band through giving and estate planning. Estate planning involves setting aside a percentage of your estate and donating it to an organization.
A few weeks after I filled out the survey, I received a letter and brochure in the mail from UGA about legacy planning for the Redcoat Band. Currently, I can only donate minimally. We’ve got a daughter in college, and we still have one in high school so we’re in the here and now when it comes to major family expenses. However, my husband and I started working with a financial advisor very early in our marriage, so hopefully when it comes time for us to retire (whenever that will be), we’ll be prepared. The brochure from UGA did get me thinking, but probably not in the way that they anticipated.
As I mentioned, college football has changed dramatically. College marching bands were once well-established parts of the tradition and pageantry of college football, but that isn’t the case anymore, at least not in the power conferences. In an effort to create the most exciting and “hype” atmospheres, enormous jumbotrons, state of the art sound systems, and extensive lighting systems have pushed marching bands to the side. It seems that only diehard traditionalists still consider marching bands an important part of college football tradition. So it makes you wonder what will happen in the next few decades. And I pondered further – should I really go to the trouble of setting up my estate to include the Redcoats when they might not even be around when it’s my time to go?
So you’re probably wondering what on earth this has to do with Girl Scouts, but stay with me. As I thought about legacy planning for the Redcoats, I also remembered the push in 2020 from GSUSA to join the Juliette Gordon Low Society. Per GSUSA’s website, you become part of the JGL Society when you leave a gift in your will, trust, or other account for Girl Scouts. Back in 2020, I requested some information about it, but I wasn’t ready at the time to commit. However, it’s always stayed in the back of my mind when we meet with our financial advisor, and I’m beginning to think about what comes next now that I’m in my 50s.
But like the Redcoats, I wonder about the future of Girl Scouts. What will Girl Scouts look like a few decades from now? The number of volunteer-led troops continues to decline, and it’s harder than ever to try to get volunteers to join. I think we’re entering into another phase where we’ll eventually transform to a different delivery model of the program. Instead of volunteer-led troops, I believe we will eventually see a majority of girl membership coming from afterschool programs run by staff. Here’s an example.
We’ll have pockets of volunteer-led troops scattered around the country, so I think there will still be volunteers, but not nearly as prevalent as in the past. However, reliance on this afterschool model will transform councils, because afterschool troops by and large cannot sustain councils, at least not the way they run today. Girls in afterschool programs usually do not attend events or summer camp outside of the meeting time after school. Due to this, I foresee the vast majority of camps being sold except around major metropolitan and affluent areas. Additionally, when it comes to cookies, girls in afterschool programs usually only sell to family and friends and do not participate in booth sales. Councils won’t be able to rely on cookie sales to support themselves, so it’s possible that councils will continue to merge into larger and larger areas to form regional councils. Or we could have a complete restructuring and move away from the federated model of councils altogether.
Afterschool troops and models other than the stereotypical volunteer-led troop aren’t anything new to Girl Scouts. They’ve been a part of us for decades. But it seems we’re seeing an acceleration of it now. Plus more and more camps and program centers are being liquidated. Some councils have completely closed brick & mortar shops altogether or have reduced down to just one in the entire council. Cookie sales will continue to be a struggle due to the economy and due to the fact that we’ve hit a price ceiling for the average consumer.
While I’ve been a very vocal critic of the Core Business Strategy and blame it for many of the issues that we’ve been facing the past two decades, I don’t think everything can be attributed to it. In my opinion, we would still be dealing with some of the same challenges due to societal trends.
I don’t believe any of this will happen overnight. It’ll be a slow process. But it does give me pause when I consider joining the JGL Society because I admittedly have doubts that we will be the same organization a few decades from now. I realize change is inevitable, but none of us have a crystal ball, and I have real questions about where we’re headed and if I should commit to funding it far in the future.
I will be 55 this year and as a Gold Award lifetime member, I have seen many changes since I first joined back in 2nd grade. However, as a current troop leader, I see the same ideals that I learned as a girl and still live by today. I have embraced some changes, such as multi-level troops, and resisted others, such as Journeys. I have to keep in mind that the world changes, and Girl Scouts will adapt and change with it. As a teacher, school is drastically different from when I was a child. In some ways, it’s better. There are other changes that are challenging and need further research and refinement. Without change, we can never grow.
Agreed
I am a member of the JGL Society although TBH I still haven’t changed my will to acknowledge that….I plan to leave some money (my understanding is it could be anything–I could designate a percentage or a dollar amount from what I have left) to the JGL Birthplace and to my local council. I applaud you for thinking ahead but, as Vay says, things change. That’s what happens. Many people leave $ to their alma maters which may have changed drastically since their matriculation. I can put you in touch with Dianne Belk if you like.
What I don’t get is that there’s seemingly no push to recruit volunteers, quite the opposite in fact, I hear more and more about these troops that the council sets up and then turns to the parents of the kids in the troop (once the council has the parents’ money of course) and goes “well… one of you is going to need to step up or these kids won’t get to do Girl Scouts!” It’s an incredibly slimy practice and I don’t see how guilt tripping already spread thin parents is going to result in a quality troop experience.
Meanwhile I’m over here getting comments on my videos from people being like “hey would it be weird if I volunteered with the Girl Scouts if I don’t have a kid in the troop?” Because the Girl Scouts not only does zero volunteer recruitment but also don’t do anything to dissuade people of the notion that you have to be a parent to volunteer.
I’m not saying there’s some magical population of volunteers out there that would solve the volunteer shortage but also surely recruiting volunteers would… increase the number of volunteers?
Hello my Girl Scout with a Cause,
I say that Girl Scouts could fix some of their problems with camps to keep them viable and running is to bring back the requirements that were used for Girl Scouts in the past to achieve the Golden Eaglet; but maybe update them to fit to today’s time. If GSUSA always wants to be innovative (which to me has wasted so much money), then reinvent the way the highest award could be achieved in a secondary and split off way from what it is now; which doesn’t require any girls to do anything of really any merit to start into the Gold Award. I say have two different ways to achieve the highest award: Gold Award with the requirements that are needed for today, or the Golden Eaglet – which requires certain commitment, dedication, and definite follow through for an extended period of time to even get to the point of submitting for the highest award and call it the Golden Eaglet with a redesign of the pin (so as to not take away from the GS’s pins of the past). There are a certain number of girls that have left GSs to go into Scouting America because of this; certain requirements that are necessary that have to be achieved before moving up in rank and submitting for the Highest Award. To me with doing it this way shows: advancement, badge work actually means something, they can see their advancements, and this is the way it was supposed to be set by The Founder. It would also give the volunteer leaders a set heading to help the girls with knowing what to do because the steps are already laid out, camps would be used because certain requirements would mandate that, and it would do what the Founder envisioned. I know that there would be a certain amount of leaders / GSs that wouldn’t want it this way, but that’s why there would be a split to achieve either one; the Gold Award, or the Golden Eaglet. This to me would solve everything; volunteerism would be solved because of the laid-out plan requirements for advancement (and it would actually mean something with what badge work needs to be done, GSs wanting to show their achievements on their vest would increase uniform and badge sells, Girls going to the camps for cooking and camping requirements, getting the GS outdoors to appreciate what’s out “there” with what the Founder wanted. I see the positive possibilities, and it wouldn’t take a whole lot of money to make it happen. It should tell the “higher ups” that with things dwindling, maybe it’s not more money needed, maybe a re-thinking of getting back to the “basics” of what Juliette saw for Girl Scouts. She was a person that had money but knew that the great things of life weren’t about money, it was “understanding” and being with the beauty of nature….she had the money though to make it happen (the Girl Scout movement in the USA) for any girl to be part of the Sisterhood that was there for them by being in Girl Scout organization regardless of financial status.