Thoughts on the MGAT Report
For the 2023 National Council Session (NCS), a number of councils submitted governance related proposals including one written by yours truly. Inspired by similar action taken by the National Board in 1993, my proposal aimed to create a national task group to study governance on both the council and national level. These specific proposals didn’t make the 2023 NCS agenda, but the National Board took action of its own anyway and appointed a task group called the Movement Governance Advisory Team (MGAT). The MGAT launched in November of 2023 and began work on several charges from the National Board centering around national governance. You can review the entirety of the original charge in the GSUSA press release on GSG.
The MGAT recently released its report. If you’ve followed my blog through the years, you’ll know that I’ve been an enthusiastic advocate for the democratic process in Girl Scouting for quite some time, so I’ve been highly anticipating this. In addition to publishing the report, the National Board Office (NBO) also hosted a webinar for National Delegates in April to review the MGAT’s findings and recommendations. The webinar and report are found on the GSUSA National Delegate website which is only open to current National Delegates and related staff. However, I received a copy of the report due to authoring a related 2023 NCS proposal, and I waited to share my thoughts until enough time had passed for National Delegates to read the report, view the webinar, and share the results with their local memberships. Continue reading

Every three years, the National Council of Girl Scouts gathers together and deliberates upon proposals aimed at the betterment of Girl Scouting. This year, the National Council Session will be held July 20 – 22, 2026 in Washington D.C., and there are three proposals on the agenda. One is about everyone’s favorite topic: membership dues.
Hear ye, hear ye! The (Early) Alert is out! For us governance nerds, it’s Christmas morning, and it’s time to unwrap all of the presents. For those of you who want to cut to the chase and not wade through my thoughts to get to the file, here you go:
The survey I received had to do with legacy planning and financially supporting the Redcoat Band. For the majority of the band’s 120 years of existence, the athletic department has financed most of the band’s budget. However, the landscape of college football has changed dramatically recently due to the implementation of NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness). In case you’re not aware of the impact of NIL, colleges can now pay their student athletes. It’s a free for all right now, and it’ll take a while to get things under control – if it ever happens. Athletic departments are cutting where they can to subsidize various revenue streams in an attempt to fund NIL. For the past two years, the size of the Redcoat Band has shrunk due to budget cuts, and so the